> top > projects > NEUROSES > docs > PMC:1084246 > divs

PMC:1084246 JSONTXT

Divisions (26) JSON TSV
 

div. section text # proj. length # Ann.
0 TIAB Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a 4 2348 0 show
1 Background Reviewers and users of reviews draw conclusions about the overall quality of the evidence that is re 3 1871 0 show
2 Methods Seventeen people independently judged the quality of evidence, the balance between benefits and harm 3 254 0 show
3 Methods Evidence profiles For each example we prepared an evidence profile. Each evidence profile was made b 3 2268 0 show
4 Methods Questions and judgements The 12 examples were selected to include a variety of health care intervent 3 2828 0 show
5 Methods Sensibility and understandability After grading all 12 examples, the judges were asked 16 questions 3 1860 0 show
6 Results Quality of evidence for each outcome The quality of evidence for each outcome as assessed by the 17 3 1603 0 show
7 Results Relative importance of each outcome Specification of outcomes in the question that each example addr 3 729 0 show
8 Results Overall quality of important outcomes There was a lack of agreement about the overall quality of evi 3 1270 0 show
9 Results Balance between benefits and harms The graders assessments about the balance between benefits and ha 3 788 0 show
10 Results Recommendation The graders individual considerations about the recommendations are shown in Table 8. 3 586 0 show
11 Results Sensibility and understandability Eleven raters provided feedback on the sensibility and understanda 3 2570 0 show
12 Discussion This pilot study of the GRADE approach to grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommenda 3 4467 0 show
13 Conclusion Based on the results of this pilot study we have been able to considerably improve our system for gr 3 166 0 show
14 Pre-publication history The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: 3 64 0 show
15 Caption-Table 1 Example of an evidence profile quality assessment given to the evaluators for them to grade in the p 3 217 0 show
16 Caption-Table 2 Example of an evidence profile summary of findings given to the evaluators for them to grade in the 3 218 0 show
17 Caption-Table 3 Summary of the judgements made by the 17 evaluators for Example 1 of the pilot study. Should depress 3 173 0 show
18 Caption-Table 4 Results, summary of the judgements made by the 17 evaluators of the quality for each of the outcomes 3 149 0 show
19 Caption-Table 5 Results, summary of the judgements made by the 17 evaluators of the overall quality in the 12 exampl 3 121 0 show
20 Caption-Table 6 Results, kappa agreement among the evaluators for each of the 12 examples in the pilot study 3 92 0 show
21 Caption-Table 7 Results, summary of the judgements made by the 17 evaluators about the balance between benefits and 3 152 0 show
22 Caption-Table 8 Results, summary of the recommendations made the 17 evaluators for each of the 12 examples in the pi 3 109 0 show
23 Caption-Table 9 Example of a modified GRADE evidence profile quality assessment. Table 9 and 10 is what Table 1 and 3 576 0 show
24 Caption-Table 10 Example of a modified GRADE evidence profile summary of findings. Table 9 and 10 is what Table 1 and 3 182 0 show
25 Caption-Table 11 Modified GRADE quality assessment criteria 3 42 0 show